The reason I mark this down will not be popular. The claims against Savile are not as open and shut as many believe. Nany of the accusations do not stand up to even the most basic investigation. Savile was famous. His location was of public accord most if the time via the media and tv work. Some accusations have been proved false because they use a timeframe when Savile was known to be somewhere else. Other claims mention his famous yellow rolls royce but their claim was becorehe had that car. Other claims about assualts in bbc premises after shows were fake because they assumed the show was made at bbc studios when in fact the show was made at bbc theatre, shepherds bush, a different location. Out of 475 claims against Saviour estate about 75 percent got rejected for not being possible due to some of the reasons mentioned. Imagine if the others had gone through the law courts, they may all have been rejected. And as for the morgue claim, that is rubbish. The country went through mass hysteria for a year accusing all first of old entertainers of abuse and most were innocent. I hope some people investigate the claims more